Cases 21 - 30 of 258
Hill v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv01633
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hill and **Sanctioned/Barred* Lisa Hill
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, T Washington, Charlie Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (DO NOT USE)
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 5:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Janella Denice Johnson, Vincent E Webb, City of Shreveport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin et al v. Shreveport
as 5:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
Kevin Goodwin, Mark Sharbano, Brian Monette and others
Defendant:
City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Coleman v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Alexander Coleman
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, P Tucker, K9 Cairo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
John L Mays, Jr
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Shreveport Police Dept, Internal Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lewis v. Horton et al
as 5:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Lewis
Defendant:
Demetrius Horton, American Alternative Insurance Corporation and City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Horton et al
as 5:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Lewis
Defendant:
Demetrius Horton, American Alternative Insurance Corp and City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Payton v. City of Shreveport Louisiana et al
as 5:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Kevin Payton
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, Shreveport Police Dept, T D Weldon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Shreveport
as 5:2021cv03739
Plaintiff:
Randall Ward Anderson
Defendant:
City of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
