Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Torres v. Faxton-St. Luke's Healthcare
as 17-30
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ricco Ray Torres, Administrator of the Estate of Cindy M. Golden and as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.T., and infant under the age of 10 years and Joseph Bumbolo, Administrator of the Estate of Michele Bumbolo and Administrator of the Estate of Michael Bumbolo
Defendant:
Faxton-St. Luke's Healthcare, AKA Mohawk Valley Health System, Lingappa S. Amernath, M.D., John Doe, M.D. (a fictional name more fully described herein) and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James W. Graeff, Who during their employment, association, and/or affiliation with the City of Utica, New York, City of Utica Police Department and City of Utica Fire Department responded, arrested, investigate, took into custody appeared or otherwise par, Dzevad Bajrektarevic, Who during their employment, association, and/or affiliation with the City of Utica, New York, City of Utica Police Department and City of Utica Fire Department responded, arrested, investigate, took into custody appeared or otherwis, Brian Banser, Who during their employment, association, and/or affiliation with the City of Utica, New York, City of Utica Police Department and City of Utica Fire Department responded, arrested, investigate, took into custody appeared or otherwise partic and others
Bumbolo v. Faxton St. Luke's Healthcare et al
as 6:2016cv00441
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bumbolo
Defendant:
Faxton St. Luke's Healthcare , Lingappa S. Amernath , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Torres v. Faxton St. Lukes Healthcare et al
as 6:2016cv00439
Plaintiff:
Ricco Ray Torres
Defendant:
Faxton St. Lukes Healthcare , Lingappa S. Amernath , John Doe and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Joseph Bumbolo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumbolo v. Faxton St. Luke's Healthcare et al
as 6:2016cv00449
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bumbolo
Defendant:
Faxton St. Luke's Healthcare , Lingappa S. Amernath , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
