Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Oliver v. Rutherford et al
as 4:2010cv00893
Defendant:
Frank Rutherford , Youngstown Police Department , Jimmy F. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
William Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 09-3920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, ROSS CIRINCIONE, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor:
THE STATE OF OHIO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 08-4559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, KATHARINE LANG BETTASSO, in her official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor:
THE STATE OF OHIO
Ludt v. City of Youngstown, Ohio, et. al
as 4:2007cv02089
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Ohio, Michael Damiano and Jay Williams
Plaintiff:
James ludt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelley et al v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2007cv00881
Plaintiff:
Mark K. Kelley and Robert L. Dickson
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, John Hull, II, William Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
