Cases 31 - 40 of 41
City of Youngstown, State of Ohio v. Jones et al
as 4:2011cv01809
Plaintiff:
City of Youngstown, State of Ohio
Defendant:
Jeffrey B. Jones
Respondent:
Kevin Ireland and Jay Gebhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Johnson v. City of Youngstown, Ohio et al
as 4:2011cv01635
Plaintiff:
Desiree Johnson
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Ohio , Jimmy F. Hughes , Kevin Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timmings v. City of Youngstown
as 4:2011cv01555
Plaintiff:
Cory Timmings
Defendant:
City of Youngstown , City of Youngstown Police Department , Philip Chance, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Eggleston et al
as 4:2011cv00822
Plaintiff:
Gerald Johnson
Defendant:
Carlos Eggleston , City of Youngstown and John Does One through Five
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Rutherford et al
as 4:2010cv00893
Defendant:
Frank Rutherford , Youngstown Police Department , Jimmy F. Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
William Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
International Coliseums Company v. City of Youngstown
as 4:2007cv02845
Plaintiff:
International Coliseums Company
Defendant:
City of Youngstown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ludt v. City of Youngstown, Ohio, et. al
as 4:2007cv02089
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, Ohio, Michael Damiano and Jay Williams
Plaintiff:
James ludt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelley et al v. City of Youngstown et al
as 4:2007cv00881
Plaintiff:
Mark K. Kelley and Robert L. Dickson
Defendant:
City of Youngstown, John Hull, II, William Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
