Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Clarence Hearns, Jr. v. Cisnero, et al
as 22-16951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE LEONARD HEARNS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
CISNERO, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, R. MORALES, Associate Warden and others
Clarence Hearns, Jr. v. Cal Trahune, et al
as 22-55788
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLARENCE LEONARD HEARNS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
CAL TRAHUNE and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, Attorney General of the State of California
Clarence Hearns, Jr. v. Andrew Whisnand, et al
as 22-15138
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE LEONARD HEARNS, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW WHISNAND, J BARBA and S FLEMING
Clarence Leonard Hearns v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 2:2021cv06323
Petitioner:
Clarence Leonard Hearns
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clarence Hearns, Jr. v. K. Harrington
as 14-56081
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE LEONARD HEARNS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
K. HARRINGTON
Clarence Hearns, Jr. v. K. Harrington
as 14-55736
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE LEONARD HEARNS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
K. HARRINGTON
Clarence Hearns, Jr. v. K. Harrington
as 14-55474
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE LEONARD HEARNS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
K. HARRINGTON, Warden KVSP
Hearns v. Keo et al
as 5:2012cv06407
Plaintiff:
Clarence Leonard Hearns
Defendant:
C. Keo, J. Harget, J. Swangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Hearns, Jr. v. Robert Perry, et al
as 11-57140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE LEONARD HEARNS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT J. PERRY, Administrative Law Judge, individual, ABRAHAM KHAN, individual, KAREN THORP, individual and official capacity Deputy District Attorney for Los Angeles and others
Clarence Leonard Hearns v. Robert J Perry et al
as 2:2011cv09212
Defendant:
Glenette Blackwell, Ronald M Geltz, Ronald M Geltz and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Leonard Hearns
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
