Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Jackson v. Maye
as 5:2020cv03189
Respondent:
Claude Maye
Petitioner:
Michael Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Maye
as 5:2020cv03115
Respondent:
Claude Maye
Petitioner:
Horace Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Torres-Diaz v. Baker et al
as 5:2020cv03099
Defendant:
Reginald Baker, Claude Maye and U.S. Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Torres-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. United States, et al
as 19-3047
Defendant:
(FNU) CLARK, USP-Leavenworth, in his individual and official capacity, JOHN/JANE DOES, Unit Team or Other, in their individual and official capacities, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Director of the Federal Burea of Prisons, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, WITT, Correctional Officer, USP-Leavenworth, in her indiviudal and official capacity, LIONHART, Special Investigation Service, USP-Leavenworth, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv03095
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark S. Inch, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Staples v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv03094
Plaintiff:
William Staples
Defendant:
United States of America, Mark S. Inch, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirkland v. Maye
as 5:2018cv03058
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Kirkland
Respondent:
Claude Maye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pool v. Maye
as 17-3011
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY AUSTIN POOL
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAUDE MAYE
Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Alupe, et al
as 16-3372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant - Appellee:
(FNU) ALUPE, Doctor, USPLeavenworth, CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, USPLeavenworth, FNU LNU (1), Health Services Supervisor, USP Leavenworth and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
