Cases 1 - 10 of 533
Frier v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Claudia J. Frier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jose Figueroa-Merida, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10836
Petitioner:
JOSE FIGUEROA-MERIDA and CLAUDIA NINETH FIGUEROA ROLDAN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Claudia Matos v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10773
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA SOUSA MATOS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Maritza v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Claudia Lorza Maritza
Respondent:
Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Voronina et al v. LL Atlanta, LLC
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Brooke Johnson, Cielo Jean Gibson, Jessica Hinton and others
Defendant:
LL Atlanta, LLC doing business as Opera Nightclub
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Moreland et al v. Da Bomb Platinum LLC
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Andra "Ana" Cheri Moreland, Brenda Geiger, Claudia Sampedro and others
Defendant:
Da Bomb Platinum LLC doing business as Da Bomb Sports Bar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Moreland et al v. Icebar Atlanta, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Andra Ana Cheri Moreland, Claudia Sampedro and Iesha Marie Crespo
Defendant:
Icebar Atlanta, LLC doing business as Ice Bar Atlanta and Malcom Lee
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
