Cases 21 - 30 of 63
In re: Marc Stephens, et al
as 19-1447
Undetermined:
DET. SANTIAGO INCLE, JR., NINA C. REMSON, Attorney at Law, LLC, WILLIAM J. MARTINI and others
ACOSTA et al v. HIGHWAY ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 2:2018cv17725
Defendant:
DELILAH'S DEN ATLANTIC CITY, XSCAPE GOGO, PROPERTIES 40 BRIGHTON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RHIAN SUGDEN, PAOLA CANAS, MEGAN DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
HABERSTROH v. AGENT ELITE, INC.
as 3:2018cv04121
Defendant:
AGENT ELITE, INC.
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA HABERSTROH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Letter of Request from Argentina
as 1:2018mc00016
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Maria Claudia Magarik Alvardo and Walter Oscar Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
CHERI et al v. LINVAS CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv08317
Plaintiff:
ANA CHERI , ARIANNY LOPEZ , BRITTANY WILCOX and others
Defendant:
LINVAS CORP. and VINCENT MOSCHILLO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
NELSON v. BROWN et al
as 2:2017cv03232
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. NELSON
Defendant:
DAVID L. BROWN, JOHN M. CLARK , DANIEL J. DE LUCA and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Letter Request from Argentina
as 1:2016mc00363
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Margarik Alvarado Maria Claudia and Walter Oscar Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Arnold et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01345
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Arnold , Theodore R Babcock , Connie R Babcock and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Claudia Moreno Garcia v. Attorney General United State
as 16-2609
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA MORENO GARCIA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claudia Flores-Rios v. Attorney General United State
as 16-1277
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA PATRICIA FLORES-RIOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
