Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Filed in Error
as 4:2022mc01094
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Ruth R. Hughs, Lizzie Pannill Fletcher, Al Green and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gorham v. Kaufman
as 2:2022mc00008
Not Classified By Court:
Patrick Gorham
Defendant:
Michelle Kaufman, Claudia Mathis and Expedia Financial Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Northwest Pacific Property Management, LLC
Garnishee:
Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Company
Chimbo-Cajamarca v. Garland
as 21-60936
Petitioner:
Claudia Alexandra Chimbo-Cajamarca
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sanchez v. Iduarte
as 4:2021cv00984
Petitioner:
Claudia Sanchez and Claudia Yudith Sanchez
Respondent:
Jorge Iduarte and Jorge Rios Iduarte
First Command Fin Svc v. Exner
as 21-10727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
First Command Financial Services, Incorporated, First Command Financial Planning, Incorporated, also known as First Command Brokerage Services, Incorporated, First Command Insurance Services, Incorporated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Joachim W. Exner, Claudia Exner and Exner & Associates, Incorporated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
