Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Clearone Advantage, LLC v. Kersen et al
as 1:2023cv03446
Plaintiff:
Clearone Advantage, LLc
Defendant:
Michael H. Kersen and Lamar Gilmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Clearone Communications, Inc. v. Donald Bowers
as 23-10313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD BOWERS
Frank Recruitment Group, Inc. v. ClearOne Advantage, LLC
as 8:2022cv02280
Defendant:
Frank Recruitment Group, Inc. and ClearOne Advantage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
ClearOne v. PathPartner Technology et al
as 2:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
ClearOne
Defendant:
PathPartner Technology and PathPartner Technology PVT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ClearOne Communications v. Chiang, et al
as 16-4200
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Defendant:
ANDREW CHIANG, an individual, JUN YANG, an individual, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts corporation and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
DONALD BOWERS
Interlink Group Professional Services, Inc. v. ClearOne, Inc.
as 1:2016cv24338
Plaintiff:
Interlink Group Professional Services, Inc.
Defendant:
ClearOne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Interlink Group Professional Services, Inc. v. ClearOne, Inc.
as 1:2016cv23156
Plaintiff:
Interlink Group Professional Services, Inc.
Defendant:
ClearOne, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ClearOne v. RSM US LLP
as 2:2016cv00736
Plaintiff:
ClearOne
Defendant:
RSM US LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ClearOne Communications v. Chiang (Bowers)
as 16-4083
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
:
ClearOne Communications v. Chiang (Bowers), et al
as 15-4027
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Interested Party - Appellant:
DONALD BOWERS
Defendant:
ANDREW CHIANG, JUN YANG, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, INC., a Massachusetts corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
