Cases 41 - 50 of 130
Faulkner et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02269
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Faulkner and Clifford Faulkner
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02042
Plaintiff:
Laura Warren and Clifford Warren
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirby et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Sherry Kirby and Clifford S. Kirby
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coenen v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv16357
Plaintiff:
Luann Coenen and Clifford Coenen
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv09027
Plaintiff:
Linda Collins and Clifford Collins
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05571
Plaintiff:
Diane White and Clifford White
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brewster v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv05383
Plaintiff:
Clifford Ray Brewster
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Enoch v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv04585
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Enoch
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurelmeyer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02941
Plaintiff:
Alta Kurelmeyer and Clifford A. Kurelmeyer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Almquist et al v. Kinsey et al
as 1:2015cv00292
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Almquist, Jr. , Richard P. Almquist, Sr. and Loretta Almquist
Defendant:
Ronald Clifford Kinsey, James Harvey Shero, MEP Health, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
