Cases 31 - 40 of 85
WHEAT et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2017cv00050
Defendant:
SAM BEARD, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JAMEY NOEL and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRY CLIFFORD and DEAN WHEAT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00328
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patterson v. Rumsa et al
as 1:2016cv08141
Plaintiff:
Ojo Patterson
Defendant:
Nicholas Rumsa, Dennis Clifford and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford Ford v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv07539
Plaintiff:
Clifford Ford
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Jeffrey Chudy, Star No. 16126, Shawn Popow, Star No. 3255 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Clifford v. Morrow et al
as 3:2016cv03026
Defendant:
Austin Morrow and City of Carrollton
Plaintiff:
Dawn R Clifford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Clevenger v. City of North Webster Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv00337
Plaintiff:
Clifford Clevenger
Defendant:
City of North Webster Police Department , Church , North Webster Chief of Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Whitcher
as 1:2015cv07591
Plaintiff:
Clifford Harris
Defendant:
Jennifer Whitcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Clifford Cozad v. John Brooke, et al
as 15-2720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD COZAD
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN H. BROOKE, LAW OFFICES OF JOHN H. BROOKE LLC, EMMY H. STONE and others
Mark D. Schwartz, et al v. Blaylock Robert Vann, LLC, et al
as 15-1650
Plaintiff:
FRANK CLIFFORD PAUL
Appellant:
MARK D. SCHWARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAYLOCK ROBERT VANN, LLC, ERIC V. STANDIFER and AQUACENA LOPEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
