Cases 1 - 10 of 58
WOOD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00606
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD WOOD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Karolski v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01960
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Karolski
Defendant:
L. Harry, Unit Manager Ritchie, C.O. Grigas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWMAN v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD T. NEWMAN, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BARRY SMITH, SEAN BRESNCHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PUMBA v. KNAPPENBERGER et al
as 5:2022cv02078
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
CLIFFORD KNAPPENBERGER, II, KEITH KOWAZ, FRANK HEFFERNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muniz et al v. Zayas
as 2:2021cv02762
Petitioner:
SGT NATHANIEL DAVIS, CO Larry Burnett, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Muniz
Defendant:
Angelo Zayas, MICHAELE FARRELL, CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT JEUDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NELSON v. REYNOLDS et al
as 5:2019cv02009
Defendant:
STEVEN MILLER, CO SCOTT REYNOLDS, CLIFFORD KNAPPENBERGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHAKA BEKOE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARREN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2019cv00097
Defendant:
SUSAN CONINE, DOUG YUHOUSE, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOOD v. USA
as 2:2019cv00084
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FOSS v. SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FAYETTE et al
as 5:2018cv05313
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI FAYETTE
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD M. FOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fassnacht v. Garman
as 5:2018cv03270
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD FASSNACHT
Respondent:
PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARK GARMAN and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
