Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gooden v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. Lane
as 4:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent:
Tim Lane
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gooden v. United States et al
as 4:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
United States and Ku Klux Klan Organization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. Heyer et al
as 4:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
Brian Heyer and Tim Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. Scott County Prosecutors et al
as 4:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
Scott County Prosecutors, Robert Lee Cusack, Meghan Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. Corbin et al
as 4:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Defendant:
Meghan Corbin, Elizabeth O'Donnell, Chris Widmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Pratt et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Reynolds
Defendant:
Robert W Pratt, Clifford Cronk, III, Tomas Tovar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooden v. State of Iowa
as 4:2020cv00200
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Petitioner:
Clifford Gooden and Clifford A. Gooden, III
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gooden v. Iowa, State of
as 1:2020cv00065
Petitioner:
Clifford Arnell Gooden, III and Clifford A Gooden, III
Defendant:
Iowa, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Powell v. Conrad et al
as 4:2019cv00187
Defendant:
Dennis Conrad, Mark Jackson, Medical Personal and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Tomar Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
