Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Clifford v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01830
Plaintiff:
Onika Frances Clifford
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Butsch v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv05809
Plaintiff:
Clayton E Butsch
Defendant:
Department of Corrections , Katrina Kenry and Clifford Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels et al v. The Boeing Company
as 3:2013cv05679
Defendant:
The Boeing Company , John and Jane Doe and John Doe Two Company
Plaintiff:
Clifford C Daniels and Eileen N Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Clifford v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01158
Plaintiff:
Teresa Clifford
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Matter v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv05213
Plaintiff:
Bernard J Matter
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Bernard Warner, Mark Stern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Morgan et al
as 3:2013cv05028
Plaintiff:
Claude Allen Price, Jr
Defendant:
Sharon Morgan, Clifford Johnson, Frank Longano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv01467
Plaintiff:
Clifford A Cross
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clifford v. Clay Lacy Aviation, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00408
Plaintiff:
Timothy Clifford
Defendant:
Clay Lacy Aviation Inc and Jetstar Air Inc
Interested Party:
Mr. David Robert Osgood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nelson v. Pacholke et al
as 3:2012cv05048
Plaintiff:
Edward Joseph Nelson
Defendant:
Dan Pacholke, Pat Glebe, Ron Fraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galekovich v. City of Vancouver et al
as 3:2011cv05736
Plaintiff:
Harry Galekovich
Defendant:
City of Vancouver , Eric Holms, Pete Mayer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
