Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Levesque v. Clinton County Jail et al
as 9:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Clinton County Jail and John/Jane Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acevedo v. Clinton County Jail et al
as 9:2018cv00576
Defendant:
C.O. Thowerton, C.O. Brehm, Clinton County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Acevedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayer v. Clinton County et al
as 9:2017cv00905
Plaintiff:
Martin Peter Mayer
Defendant:
Clinton County, Clinton County Jail and Clinton County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayer v. Clinton County et al
as 1:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
Martin Peter Mayer
Defendant:
Clinton County, Clinton County Jail and Clinton County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Heit et al
as 9:2016cv00706
Plaintiff:
Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Laura Heit and Clinton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prior v. Golden et al
as 8:2015cv00009
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Prior, Jr.
Defendant:
State Trooper Golden, John Doe #1, Correction Officer Dragoon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weldon v. Clinton County Jail et al
as 9:2014cv01276
Plaintiff:
Jessee M. Weldon
Defendant:
Clinton County Jail, Major Smith and Swanson Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Favro et al
as 9:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Gavin Hunt
Defendant:
Dave Favro, Major Smith, Clinton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Favro et al
as 9:2014cv00418
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Dave Favro, Major Smith and Clinton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Favro et al
as 1:2014cv02360
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Dave Favro, Major Smith and Clinton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
