Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clipper Bulk Shipping LTD v. Global Smart Comtrade Pte Ltd.
as 1:2024cv02925
Petitioner:
Clipper Bulk Shipping LTD
Respondent:
Global Smart Comtrade Pte Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate
Global Montello Group Corp. v. Clipper Bulk Shipping, LTD.
as 1:2022cv10913
Plaintiff:
Global Montello Group Corp.
Defendant:
Clipper Bulk Shipping, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co., Ltd. v. M/V Clipper Kamoshio et al
as 4:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co., Ltd. as Subro Ins of Sumitomo Corp. of Americas
Defendant:
Moon Rise Shipping Co., SA, M/V Clipper Kamoshio, Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd. v. Interstate Commodities, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01660
Plaintiff:
Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd.
Defendant:
Interstate Commodities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
ING Bank N.V. v. Clipper Kasashio M/V et al
as 2:2016cv02388
Plaintiff:
ING Bank N.V.
Defendant:
Clipper Kasashio M/V and Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd., Nassau
Third_party_defendant:
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.
Third_party_plaintiff:
Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd., Nassau
Counter_claimant:
Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd., Nassau
Counter_defendant:
ING Bank N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
ING Bank N.V. v. M/V CLIPPER IYO
as 4:2015cv02004
Plaintiff:
ING Bank N.V.
Defendant:
M/V CLIPPER IYO
Claimant:
Clipper Bulk Shipping Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Lafarge Ciments v. Clipper Bulk Shipping, Ltd.
as 1:2007cv00110
Plaintiff:
Lafarge Ciments
Defendant:
Clipper Bulk Shipping, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Heracles General Cement Co. v. Clipper Bulk Shipping, Ltd.
as 1:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Heracles General Cement Co.
Defendant:
Clipper Bulk Shipping, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
