Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Peterson et al v. Prince George's County et al
as 8:2016cv01947
Plaintiff:
Clyde Peterson and Derrick W. Simmons
Defendant:
David Gross, Kenny Cheung and Prince George's County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00122
Plaintiff:
Clyde M. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rockwell et al v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al
as 1:2013cv03049
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Rockwell and Demetria R. Holden
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore , Baltimore City Police Department , Clyde Rawlins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Briggs v. Blake et al
as 8:2009cv02417
Plaintiff:
Andrea G. Briggs
Defendant:
Catherine Blake, William D. Quarles, Jr., J. Motz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. ATF-DEA Supervisors Executive
as 1:2009cv00630
Plaintiff:
Clyde Johnson
Defendant:
ATF-DEA Supervisors Executive
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Johnson v. Dixon et al
as 1:2008cv02344
Plaintiff:
Clyde Johnson
Defendant:
S. Dixon, Baltimore DDJ, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. All Negligent Parties
as 1:2008cv02343
Plaintiff:
Clyde Johnson
Defendant:
All Negligent Parties
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Preview Commission et al
as 1:2008cv02352
Plaintiff:
Clyde Johnson
Defendant:
Federal Mine Safety and Health Preview Commission, US Treasury Department, Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. U. S. Treasury Dep. et al
as 1:2008cv02349
Plaintiff:
Clyde Johnson
Defendant:
U. S. Treasury Dep., Bank of America, Compensation Board and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
