Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Jordan v. Adams
as 1:2020cv00122
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Clyde Jordan
Respondent:
Warden Brian Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jordan v. Adams
as 1:2020cv00087
Respondent:
Brian Adams
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Clyde Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lynch v. Brasher et al
as 1:2020cv02690
Defendant:
Larry David Wolfe, Ashley L. Culberson, Michael D. Mann and others
Plaintiff:
Raoul Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01437
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Robinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parsons v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01692
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Clyde Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00089
Defendant:
CLYDE ALLEN, LISA FOUNTAIN, JACK KOON and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLYDE ARMORY INC, et al v. UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Blaine Williams, Judd Drake, Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Armory, Inc., FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC OF ATHENS INC, CLYDE ARMORY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Central Mutual Insurance Company v. Hudson, Jr. et al
as 1:2019cv05747
Defendant:
Clyde Hudson, Jr. and MMG Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Central Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05303
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Poole v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05810
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Clyde E. Poole, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
