Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Randolph v. Dzurenda
as 24-1647
Petitioner:
LOUIS RANDOLPH and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
JAMES DZURENDA
Randolph v. Dzurendas
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Louis Randolph and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clyde Lewis v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 22-16547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLYDE LEWIS, AKA Louis Randolph
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Director, NDOC, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., Warden, SDCC, MINOR ADAMS, Asst. Warden, SDCC and others
Al-Bustani v. Alger et al
as 3:2022cv05238
Defendant:
Kay Stone, Sean B Alger, Steve Outtrim and others
Plaintiff:
Al-Hareth Al-Albustani and Al-Hareth Al-Bustani
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05211
Defendant:
Kay Stone, Sean B Alger, Steve Outtrim and others
Plaintiff:
Al-Hareth Al-Albustani
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Louis Randolph v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 22-15385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS A. RANDOLPH, AKA Clyde Lewis
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., JAMES STOGNER, Chaplain NNCC, JUSTIN, swald Justin Reyes per [43] -Food Staff Manager (SDCC) and others
Lewis v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2019cv01729
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis and Louis Randolph
Defendant:
M. Travis, James Dzurenda, Timothy Filson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis Randolph v. E. McDaniel, et al
as 11-16348
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS A. RANDOLPH, AKA Clyde Lewis
Respondent - Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIEL, Warden and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Louis Randolph v. E. McDaniel
as 11-70482
Petitioner:
LOUIS A. RANDOLPH, AKA Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
E. K. MCDANIEL, Warden
Randolph v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2011cv00077
Petitioner:
Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
E. K. McDaniel and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
