Cases 1 - 10 of 42
COBB-MATLOCK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2023cv02615
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
BETH COBB-MATLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abdul Mohammed v. Christopher Cooper, et al
as 23-5167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher R. Cooper, Beryl A. Howell, James E. Boasberg and others
MOHAMMED v. COOPER et al
as 1:2023cv01475
Plaintiff:
ABDUL MOHAMMED
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER COOPER, BERYL A. HOWELL, JAMES BOASBERG and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
KENNESTONE HOSPITAL, INC. et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
KENNESTONE HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as WELLSTAR KENNESTONE HOSPITAL and COBB HOSPITAL, INC. doing business as WELLSTAR COBB HOSPITAL
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Wallace Mitchell v. Joan Davage, et al
as 22-5171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wallace Mitchell
Defendant / Appellee:
Joan Davage, Mental Health Technician, Nicole Colbert, Chaplain, Kathleen Jo Landerkin, Deputy Warden, also known as Ewok and others
COBB v. BAKER
as 1:2021cv02419
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. COBB
Defendant:
DINEEN BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
WALLACE v. DAVAGE et al
as 1:2021cv00980
Defendant:
ANTOINE COBB, ERIC GUNN, JIMMIE ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rose Duru v. United States Government, et al
as 20-5109
Defendant / Appellee:
Arthur M. Southam, M.D., Nathalia Cimbolti, Outreach Specialist, Bernard J. Tyson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rose Adanma Duru
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
