Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rolon et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01441
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rolon, Christopher Adamchek, Michael Aliffi and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Michel et al v. Mapfre Insurance et al
as 3:2022cv01403
Plaintiff:
Stevenson Michel and Larisha Cobb
Defendant:
Mapfre Insurance and Nicole Keller
Reid v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Donna Reid
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Matthew J. Budzik, Susan Quinn Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Golden v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Klrista Cobbs Golden
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00854
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01629
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
USA v. $53,000.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2014cv01728
Defendant:
$53,000.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Luisa Maria Salazar-Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
