Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Cobb v. Nationwide Chauffeured Services LLC
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Bill Cobb
Defendant:
Nationwide Chauffeured Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
UNITED STATES v. 0.1785 acres of land, more or less, situate in Chesapeake, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MSF Investors II, LLC, Arcadia Equity Associates, City Of Chesapeake and others
Cobbs v. Walmart
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Cobbs
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Sims v. Akers et al
as 7:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Jonah Dwight Sims
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Akers, Correctional Officer J. Barnett, Correctional Officer A.G. Tompa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. William et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Colonel William, Colonel Atkins, CtL. Wessenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Haug et al
as 7:2022cv00610
Plaintiff:
Raymond Michael Cobb
Defendant:
Superintendant Hoag, Lisa Ferguson, Lt. Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobbs v. Bower et al
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Ma'Qual Cobbs
Defendant:
E. Bower, M. Grant, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Garcia, et al.
as 3:2021cv00681
Plaintiff:
Ma'Qual T. Cobbs
Defendant:
Ms. Garcia, Mr. Taylor and Ms. Hagan, HSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobbs v. Walker
as 3:2021cv00663
Plaintiff:
Ma'Qual T. Cobbs
Defendant:
Officer Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caricofe v. Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail et al
as 7:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Bryan R. Hutcheson, Michael Cobb and Rockingham-Harrisonburg Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Caricofe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
