Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Catherine Moody v. Hot Topic, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Catherine Moody and Andrew Cohn
Defendant:
Hot Topic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Katrina Kostigen et al v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv10849
Defendant:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Katrina Kostigen and Martin Cohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randell Albert Hopkins v. David S Cohn et al
as 5:2020cv01267
Petitioner:
Randell Albert Hopkins and Hugh Jackson
Respondent:
Xavier Becerra, Division of Adult Institutions Legal Processing Unit, Michael Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melody Kizler et al v. Budget Finance Company et al
as 5:2020cv00296
Plaintiff:
Melody Kizler, Tyrone J Blake and Tyrone Blake
Defendant:
Budget Finance Company, Monroe Acceptance Company, Inc., Budget Funding I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Produce Exch. of L.A., et al
as 2:2019mc00097
Defendant:
Willardson Co., Inc., Sidney Feldstein, Southern California Egg Council and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03380
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Nelson Romero v. SB Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00715
Plaintiff:
Nelson Romero
Defendant:
SB Code Enforcement, SB Police Department and David Cohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 2:2018mc00047
Defendant:
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
