Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Spenillo v. Cleveland-Cliffs Monessen Coke LLC
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Joseph Spenillo
Defendant:
Cleveland-Cliffs Monessen Coke LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
COKE v. HESS et al
as 1:2022cv01694
Plaintiff:
Lester Coke and Lydell Kellam
Defendant:
Lori Hess and Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COKE v. HESS et al
as 2:2022cv04253
Plaintiff:
LESTER COKE and LYDELL KELLAM
Defendant:
LORI HESS and CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL COMPANY, LLC v. MAHALAXMI CONTINENTAL LIMITED et al
as 2:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
CONSOL PENNSYLVANIA COAL COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
MAHALAXMI CONTINENTAL LIMITED, MAHALAXMI INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, MAHALAXMI ASSOCIATES PRIVATE LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Coke v. McHugh
as 3:2019cv01028
Plaintiff:
Joyce Coke
Counter Plaintiff:
Mary McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
COKES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 2:2018cv00325
Petitioner:
JAMIE COKES
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and HON. JILL E. RANGOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERIE COKE CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ERIE COKE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7401
Walsh v Procter and Gamble et al
as 3:2016cv01007
Plaintiff:
John R. Walsh, III
Defendant:
Procter and Gamble, Nestle, Pepsi and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
COKE et al v. . et al
as 2:2012cv04680
Plaintiff:
LESTER COKE, JIM SHOWER POSSE BROWN, JR, LYNDELL KULLUM and others
Defendant:
KAREN ., BOB MAYER, VALERIE KROMAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
