Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Mosie et al v. Radioshack Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv01057
Defendant:
Radioshack Corporation, Sol Republic, Motorola Mobility and others
Plaintiff:
James A Mosie , Cole T. Walsh-Davis , Mathew Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Worldwide Digital Entertainment, LLC et al v. Woodstone Deli and Sports Grill et al
as 2:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
Worldwide Digital Entertainment, LLC and Piracy Recovery, LLC
Defendant:
Woodstone Deli and Sports Grill, Michael McMurray, Conley's Overlook LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Molly Maid Incorporated v. Cole et al
as 2:2010cv10556
Plaintiff:
Molly Maid Incorporated
Defendant:
Kerry Cole, Shirley Cole, Cole Venture Incorporated and others
National Business Development Services, Incorporated v. American Credit Education and Consulting, Incorporated et al
as 2:2007cv14841
Plaintiff:
National Business Development Services, Incorporated and National Business Development Services, Incorporated
Defendant:
American Credit Education and Consulting, Incorporated, National Financial Credit, Incorporated, Third Eye, Incorporated and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Bernadino J. Pavone and Abood Samaan
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
VR-Tech Data Processing Solutions, L. L. C., VR-Tech Marketing Group, L. L. C., VR-Tech Real Estate Holdings, Incorporated and others
Counter Claimant:
VR-Tech Data Processing Solutions, L. L. C., VR-Tech Marketing Group, L. L. C., VR-Tech Real Estate Holdings, Incorporated and others
Counter Defendant:
National Business Development Services, Incorporated and National Business Development Services, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Twenty Four Karat Promotions, L. L. C. et al v. Perry
as 2:2007cv11400
Plaintiff:
Twenty Four Karat Promotions, L. L. C., Zeola Gaye and Barbara Cole
Defendant:
Quinton Perry
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
