Cases 31 - 40 of 47
RUSSELL et al v. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.
as 3:2019cv00395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUSSELL and JODI RUSSELL
Defendant:
HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC., COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY and HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vigil v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
as 3:2017cv00929
Plaintiff:
Melissa L Vigil
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
de Lacour et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. et al
as 1:2016cv08364
Plaintiff:
Anne de Lacour and Andrea Wright
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Co. and Tom's of Maine Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canale v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
as 7:2016cv03308
Plaintiff:
Lori Canale
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Colgate-Palmolive
as 15-2544
Plaintiff:
JEFF DYKE, JEFFREY ROSEN, SHARI ELSTEIN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE
Intervenor - Appellant:
ANA ST. JOHN
Interested Party:
CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY, LINDA D' AGOSTINO, MICHELLE SCHWANEKAMP and others
David Greenstein v. CVS Health et al
as 8:2015cv00536
Defendant:
CVS Health, Colgate Palmolive Company, Does and others
Plaintiff:
David Greenstein
Martin et al v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
as 1:2015cv01214
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company and Tom's Of Maine, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lichun Huo, John Doe (Florida), John Doe (Illinois) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Johnson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
as 1:2012cv02329
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Plaintiff:
Angela Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Donohue v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
as 1:2012cv02328
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Plaintiff:
Valerie Donohue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pearson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company
as 1:2012cv02326
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company
Plaintiff:
Kristina Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
