Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gregory Marshall v. Mall
as 16-6730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MALL, Mental Health Psychiatrist, L. MOULDEN, Associate Psychologist, B. LILLER, Chief Psychologist and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE A. FARRELLY, Executive Director and COLIN OTTEY, MD, Medical Director
Marshall v. Allaway et al
as 1:2015cv03864
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Matthew Allaway, Colin Ottey, MD and Ashraf Mahboob, MD
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 0431
Marshall v. Roderick et al.
as 1:2015cv02932
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Richard S. Roderick, Colin Ottey, MD and R. Roderick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02446
Plaintiff:
Davon Pearson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Colin Ottey, MD, Mahboob Ashraf, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ervin v. Ottey, MD et al
as 1:2015cv02263
Plaintiff:
Roger Ervin
Defendant:
Colin Ottey, MD, Wexford Health Services, Inc., Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Farrelly et al
as 1:2015cv02265
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Colin Ottey, MD, Richard S. Roderick and Michael Summerfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Ashraf, MD et al
as 1:2015cv02177
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Mahboob Ashraf, MD and Coline Ottey, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dent v. Wexford Health Sources Incorporated et al
as 8:2015cv00206
Plaintiff:
Robert Dent
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, Gilmore Janice, Colin Ottey, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Clark et al
as 1:2014cv03344
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
Janett Clark, Colin Ottey, MD and Ava Joubert, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Roderick et al
as 1:2014cv02777
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
R. Roderick, Frank Bishop, Colin Ottey, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
