Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Pamarope Pty Limited v. Coloplast Corp.
as 1:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Pamarope Pty Limited
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BROCK v. COLOPLAST CORP.
as 2:2020cv18726
Plaintiff:
ELAINE BROCK
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akbasheva v. Coloplast Corp.
as 3:2020cv14049
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and COLOPLAST CORP.
Plaintiff:
Zaliya Akbasheva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Godreau-Rivera et al v. Coloplast Corp.
as 1:2019cv01807
Plaintiff:
Rosario Godreau-Rivera and Jose Rivera-Kercado
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GROSS et al v. COLOPLAST CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv04385
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GROSS and TIMOTHY GROSS
Defendant:
COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC. and COLOPLAST CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
COOEY et al v. COLOPLAST CORP. et al
as 1:2018cv08461
Plaintiff:
RITA COOEY and HARVEY COOEY
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORP., COLOPLAST A/S and COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING, US, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MENDEZ et al v. COLOPLAST CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv06765
Plaintiff:
ALICIA MENDEZ and JUAN MENDEZ
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORP. , MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC, PRODESCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ZARADIC et al v. COLOPLAST CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv06763
Plaintiff:
SHARYN ZARADIC and DRAZEN ZARADIC
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORP. , COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC , COLOPLAST A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORGAN et al v. COLOPLAST CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv06764
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN MORGAN and DON RUSSELL MORGAN
Defendant:
COLOPLAST CORP. , COLOPLAST MANUFACTURING US, LLC , COLOPLAST A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
