Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Bartos v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection et al
as 1:2008cv00366
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Bartos
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, Kathleen A. McGinty, Patrick McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
M&M STONE CO. v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al
as 2:2007cv04784
Plaintiff:
M&M STONE CO.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ROGER J. HORNBERGER, J. SCOTT ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fednav, Limited v. Steven Chester
as 07-2083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FEDNAV, LIMITED, CANADIAN FOREST NAVIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED, NICHOLSON TERMINAL AND DOCK COMPANY and others
Amicus Curiae:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, for the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, New York, Ohio and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, PATRICIA L. BIRKHOLZ, Michigan State Senator, ANN H. REST, Minnesota State Senator and others
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN E. CHESTER, Director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality and MICHAEL COX, Attorney General for the State of Michigan
Intervenor - Appellee:
MICHIGAN UNITED CONSERVATION CLUBS, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNSEL, INCORPORATED and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY SANITARY AUTHORITY
as 2:2007cv00737
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY SANITARY AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Cm PA, et al v. EPA, et al
as 04-1211
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection and State of Delaware
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
American Lung Association, Environmental Defense, Natural Resources Defense Council and others
St NY, et al v. EPA
as 03-1380
Petitioner:
State of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Maine and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Clean Air Implementation Project, Steel Manufacturers Association, Specialty Steel Industry of North America and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
Utility Air Regulatory Group, Equipment Replacement Rule Coalition, Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and others
Terminated Party:
National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Regulatory Project and Missouri House of Representatives
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Adirondack Mountain Club
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Senator, Jon S. Corzine, Senator, James M. Jeffords, Senator and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Washington Legal Foundation, State of Indiana and State of Ohio
Appalachian Power Co, et al v. EPA
as 99-1268
Petitioner:
Appalachian Power Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Central and South West Services, Inc. and others
Terminated Party:
Central Illinois Light Company, Commonwealth Edison Company, Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection
Appalachian Power Co, et al v. EPA
as 99-1200
Petitioner:
Appalachian Power Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Carolina Power & Light Company and others
Terminated Party:
Central Illinois Light Company, Commonwealth Edison Company, Indianapolis Power & Light Company and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Protection, Appalachian Mountain Club, Clean Air Council and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
State of Connecticut, Detroit Public Lighting, Grand Haven Board of Light and Power and others
Intervenor:
PSEG Power LLC
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
State of New Jersey
:
, , and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
