Cases 1 - 6 of 6
CRAWFORD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
ROBIN CRAWFORD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Witmer v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of General Services
as 1:2017cv01719
Plaintiff:
Brandy L. Witmer
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of General Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
ZIMMERMANN v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD et al
as 2:2016cv04564
Plaintiff:
E. EDWARD ZIMMERMANN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - MINIMUM WAGE DIVISION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PREVAILING WAGE DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MEARS v. CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. et al
as 2:2014cv06259
Plaintiff:
KHALIF R. MEARS
Defendant:
CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. , STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION , SP PLUS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
AMTRAK , NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cross_defendant:
BRANDYWINE CIRA, LP., BRANDYWINE REALTY TRUST, CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PA. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States Of America v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2010cv02672
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of General Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
WHITEST et al v. HARLAN ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv02496
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA WHITEST, DENEA WHITEST, DANIEL WHITEST and others
Defendant:
HARLAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, MYR GROUP, INC., HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
