Cases 1 - 10 of 11
RATCLIFF v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00174
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO. INC, CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC., L'OREAL USA CREATIVE INC. As Subrogee Of THE MAYBELLINE CO. As Subrogee Of MAYBELLINE INC. doing business as MAYBELLINE formerly known as MAYBELLINE COSMETICS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
RATCLIFF and JODY E. RATCLIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ayers v. Conagra Foods, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Ayers
Defendant:
Conagra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steenburg v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00130
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Henry Steenburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cashwell v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 5:2010cv00046
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Naomi Cashwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knight v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00540
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc., Food Lion, Inc., Delhaize America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby L Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bolar, et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00502
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shirley Bolar, Stonie Brown, Robert Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cox v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Geneva Cox and Geneva Cox
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kester v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00127
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Kester and Bruce A. Kester
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Davis v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00126
Plaintiff:
Margie Davis and Margie Davis
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
