Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Tribes of The Yakama Nation v. Klickitat County, et al
as 19-35807
Defendant / Appellee:
KLICKITAT COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, KLICKITAT COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, an agency of Klickitat County, BOB SONGER, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, a sovereign federally recognized Native Nation
Yakama Nation v. Yakima County, et al
as 19-35199
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TOPPENISH, a municipality of the State of Washington and YAKIMA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, a sovereign federally recognized Native Nation
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op46202
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Yakima County et al
as 1:2018cv03190
Plaintiff:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Defendant:
Yakima County, City of Toppenish and Toppenish, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation v. Klickitat County et al
as 1:2018cv03110
Plaintiff:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation
Defendant:
Klickitat County , Klickitat County Sheriffs Office , Klickitat County Department of the Prosecuting Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation v. Klickitat County et al
as 1:2017cv03192
Plaintiff:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation
Defendant:
Klickitat County, Klickitat County Sheriffs Office, Klickitat County Department of the Prosecuting Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Dave Irving, et al
as 17-35329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVE IRVING, in his official capacity as the Manager of the Leavenworth Fisheries Complex, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DANIEL M. ASHE, in his official capacity as the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Dave Irving, et al
as 17-35295
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILD FISH CONSERVANCY
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVE IRVING, in his official capacity as the Manager of the Leavenworth Fisheries Complex, U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, JIM KURTH, in his official capacity as the Acting Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Intervenor-Defendant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE RESERVATION and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Rod Runyon, et al
as 17-35207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROD RUNYON, Commission Chair of the Wasco County Board of Commissioners, STEVE KRAMER, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners, SCOTT HEGE, County Commissioner of the Wasco County Board of County Commissioners and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
FRIENDS OF THE COLUMBIA GORGE, INC., COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER and OREGON PHYSICIANS FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Movant:
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION, THE CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE WARM SPRINGS RESERVATION OF OREGON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Air Liquide America Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00164
Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation, Arkema Inc., BP West Coast Products LLC and others
509) 575-1227 (fax:
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 CERCLA Hazardous Waste Cleanup Costs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
