Cases 11 - 20 of 172
Davis #227488 v. Horton
as 2:2022cv00036
Petitioner:
Earvin R. Davis #227488
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Page #866570 v. Horton et al
as 2:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jeffrey Page #866570
Defendant:
Patricia Lamb, Ressie A. Stranaly, Gerald Covert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard #400860 v. Horton et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dylan Beard #400860
Defendant:
Connie Horton, Unknown Bucanon and MDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kranz #803848 v. Horton
as 2:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
Earl Robert Kranz #803848
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quigley #427831 v. Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Shawn Paul Quigley #427831
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Carmen McEntyre Leon, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gresham #272603 v. Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Connie Horton, R. Corgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White #225440 v. Newcomb et al
as 2:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Valiant Leon White #225440, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheri Newcomb, Unknown Burke, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballas #492046 v. Horton
as 2:2021cv00247
Petitioner:
Joseph P. Ballas #492046
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Resch #304507 v. Rink et al
as 2:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marcus Resch #304507
Defendant:
David Rink, Kelly M. Wellman, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesto #419888 v. Horton
as 2:2021cv00225
Petitioner:
Rodger Nesto #419888
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
