Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bradford v. Albercook et al
as 4:2016cv12214
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Bradford
Defendant:
Caren Albercook, Connie Ives, J. Richardson and others
Michael Brown v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 14-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA A. CARUSO, RICHARD MCKEON, DENNIS M. STRAUB, Warden and others
Hagopian v. Jones et al
as 2:2013cv13437
Plaintiff:
Martin Hagopian
Defendant:
Carmeta Jones, Brenda Upston, Connie Ives and others
Hagopian #309722 v. Jones et al
as 1:2013cv00758
Plaintiff:
Martin Hagopian #309722
Defendant:
Carmeta Jones, Brenda Upston, Connie Ives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Caruso et al
as 1:2013cv12475
Plaintiff:
Michael Brown
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Richard McKeon, Dennis M. Straub and others
Berryman et al v. Neff et al
as 2:2013cv12403
Plaintiff:
Philip Berryman, James F Crawford, David Lytal and others
Defendant:
Adriane Neff, Connie Ives, James Van Summern and others
James Crawford, et al v. Prison Health Services, et al
as 13-1097
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. CRAWFORD and AL LEWIS, JR.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS JAMES MORGAN, PHILIP BERRYMAN, CARLOS CRAIG and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, named as Prisoner Health Services, R. PANDYA, SYED M. SOHAIL and others
Crawford #173114 et al v. Prison Health Services et al
as 1:2012cv00409
Plaintiff:
James F. Crawford #173114, Jr., Louis James Morgan #141026, Philip Wayne Berryman #107202 and others
Defendant:
Prison Health Services, R. Pandya, Syed Sohail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hak v. Prisoner Health Services et al
as 4:2012cv10879
Plaintiff:
Ali Hak
Defendant:
Prisoner Health Services, Beth Gardon, Linda Kopka and others
Edwards v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2012cv10312
Plaintiff:
Nathan Edwards
Defendant:
Jenkins, Harriet Squires, Stacy Westra and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
