Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Taylor v. Kemp et al
as 4:2019cv00236
Defendant:
Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Sheriff Jimmy McDuffie, Sheriff Cullen Talton
and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Taylor
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
CAVAZOS et al v. ZINKE et al
as 1:2018cv00891
Plaintiff:
JULIA CAVAZOS , NANCY CISNEROS , DEBRA CICALO
and others
Defendant:
RYAN ZINKE, JOHN TAHSUDA, III, BRYAN RICE
Cause Of Action: Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Mack v. Miller County Detention Center
as 4:2016cv04063
Plaintiff:
Malcolm C. Mack
Defendant:
Stephanie Potter-Black, Prosecuting Attorney Office, Paul Nall
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams et al v. Chesapeake Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2016cv01346
Plaintiff:
Robert C Abrams, Jr. , Sonya M Abrams , James M Allen
and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc.
and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Potter v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
as 2:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Connie Potter
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
ALBRECHT et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2010cv06027
Plaintiff:
JOYCE HATCHER , GERALD HEFFINGTON , EDWARD HINES
and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Product Liability
Connie Marshall v. Jack Potter, et al
as 10-5394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CONNIE MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK POTTER, Individual/Offical Capacity, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Marshall v. Potter et al
as 3:2009cv00910
Plaintiff:
Connie Marshall
Defendant:
Jack Potter, United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
Jay Potter, et al v. City of Tontitown, et al
as 07-3149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jay Potter, Connie Potter, American RV Park, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Tontitown, City of, Tontitown Planning Commission, Tontitown Water and Sewer Commission
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
