Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dowling v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 8:2022cv00327
Minor:
Connor Liekhus
Plaintiff:
Theresa M Dowling and Theresa M. Dowling
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Vercellino v. Optum Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03048
Defendant:
Optum Services, Inc., United HealthCare Services, Inc., Ameritas Holding Company Health Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Vercellino
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Connor Kenney
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Ghithan v. Miller et al
as 8:2018cv00204
Respondent:
William Connor, Tom Miller and Kristjen Nielsen
Petitioner:
Hasan S.D. Ghithan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1154 Immigration and Nationality Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
