Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Conrad v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
Shawn J Conrad
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Conrad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05732
Plaintiff:
Jamie K Conrad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Say v. United States Judicial System et al
as 1:2023cv03058
Plaintiff:
Nathan Conrad Say, Aaron Joseph Cunningham and Bradley Thomas Dwyer
Defendant:
The United States Judicial System, The United States of America, United States Judicial System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagos v. Goodwill et al
as 2:2022cv01436
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Goodwill, Seattle Police Department, City of Seattle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conrad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv06195
Plaintiff:
Jamie Conrad
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Saul
as 4:2020cv05227
Plaintiff:
Heather Conrad Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Conrad v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03189
Plaintiff:
Shawn J Conrad
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Conrad v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00316
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
John Vernon Conrad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Abbott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv00307
Plaintiff:
Duane Roberts, Juventino Sagrero-Perez, Billy Moore and others
Defendant:
Chemours Company, Dynax Corporation, 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Conrad v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv05215
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
William Conrad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
