Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Vandross v. Williams et al.
as 8:2021cv01490
Plaintiff:
Charles Nemon Vandross
Defendant:
Perry Correctional Institution, Warden Charles Williams, Deputy Warden John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. State of South Carolina Criminal Justice System, The et al
as 9:2019cv02919
Plaintiff:
John Baccus and John Baccus Roosevelt
Defendant:
Warden Scott Lewis, Tamara Conwell, K. Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Conwell
as 8:2018cv02391
Plaintiff:
Johnathan D Simmons
Defendant:
Tamra Conwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 9:2018cv01880
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
Brian P Stirling, Dept of Corrections, N.C. Marchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 8:2018cv01880
Defendant:
David C Norton, Alan M Wilson, Brian P Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Conwell et al
as 6:2017cv00749
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
Tammie Conwell, Liz Sexton, J Edmund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geiger v. Lexington County School District Two et al
as 3:2016cv00237
Plaintiff:
Anne Richardson Geiger
Defendant:
Lexington County School District Two, William H Bingham, Jr, Elizabeth Dickerson Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaglin v. Sterling et al
as 0:2014cv04003
Plaintiff:
Adrian T Eaglin
Defendant:
Bryant Sterling, Larry Cartledge, Florence Mauney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Baccus v. Sterling et al
as 9:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
Brian Sterling, Tamara Conwell, Nancy C Merchant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Merchant et al
as 9:2013cv03433
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
N C Merchant and Tamara Conwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
