Cases 1 - 10 of 49
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC
as 1:2023mi00110
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC doing business as Microtel Inn and Suites
Conyers v. Carter et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Richard Conyers
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Carter, Warden Tracey Jefferson and Ricky Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marin v. Chatham County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Chatham County Sheriffs Office, Unit 2 Sheriffs, Mauras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conyers v. Chambers et al
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Richard Conyers
Defendant:
Warden Brian Chambers, Captain Scottie Roach, Mrs. Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
