Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Greene v. Malman Law et al
as 1:2026cv08884
Plaintiff:
Zakkiyya Ameera Greene
Defendant:
Malman Law, Steve Malman, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anjelica James v. Terrence Sharkey, et al
as 25-2400
Plaintiff:
ANJELICA R. JAMES
Defendant:
TERRENCE V. SHARKEY, Circuit Court of Cook County, IL Juvenile Justice Judge and SARAH DONOVAN, Circuit Court of Cook County Guardian Ad Litem
Smith v. Cook County IL
as 1:2024cv12404
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Defendant:
Cook County IL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Myers et al
as 1:2024cv06166
Defendant:
Dart, Myers, McCray and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Sonny et al
as 1:2024cv05805
Defendant:
Rocco, Supv. Fenderson, Cook County IL and others
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reasnover v. County of Cook, Illinois
as 1:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
Joy Reasnover
Defendant:
Cook County IL, County of Cook, Illinois, Unknown Agent(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15959
Plaintiff:
Chet Smith
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Director Mueller, Lt. Latham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Halloran et al
as 1:2023cv14786
Plaintiff:
Marcelous Pittman
Defendant:
John Halloran, James O'Brien, Michael Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
