Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Butts v. Fulton et al
as 1:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Corey lee Butts
Defendant:
Junius P. Fulton, III and Katherine M. Beye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Pamela Martin
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and Corey Keith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Williams v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Corey T. Williams
Defendant:
Mr. D. Watson and Mr. J.D. Oates III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Henry County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Corey Christopher Stephens
Defendant:
Henry County Adult Detention Facility and WellPaths Nursing and Medical w/HCADF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Walker et al
as 3:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Corey Evander Johnson
Defendant:
A. Walker, Mr. Bell and R. Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butts v. Clarke
as 1:2023cv01396
Petitioner:
Corey Lee Butts
Respondent:
Harold W Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryland v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s) et al
as 7:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Corey R Ryland
Defendant:
Director of Federal Bureau of Prison(s), North Central Regional Director, J.C. Streeval and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Butts v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00560
Petitioner:
Corey Lee Butts
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Godfrey v. Davis et al
as 2:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Rodetrick Lamont Godfrey
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jane Doe, Albert Vanderpool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. USA
as 3:2023cv00343
Petitioner:
Corey Eugene Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
