Cases 1 - 10 of 34
KELLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01404
Petitioner:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Respondent:
DR. JACKIE WEST-DENNING, KIM HOBSON, DR. NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRONE v. IPPEL et al
as 1:2021cv00232
Defendant:
CORIZON, LLC, D. JOHNSON, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CRONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Gooch v. Lisa Bergeson, et al
as 20-1582
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON, LLC, DANA MILLER, LISA BERGESON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES GOOCH
BALE v. HAMILTON COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00113
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., D/B/A CORIZON, LLC, MATTHEW LAWSON, EL HADJI NDLAYE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. BALE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TYLER A. BALE, DECEASED and JAMES D. BALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Jefferson, Jr. v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 19-2605
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent, in his individual and official capacities as Superintendent of Westville Correctional Facility, ANDREW LIAW, Doctor and CORIZON, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE F. JEFFERSON, JR.
LEE v. MITCHEFF et al
as 2:2019cv00297
Defendant:
ALBRIGHT, T. LITTLEJOHN, BRYD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02338
Defendant:
JANE DOE, MICHAEL KING, CORIZON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malachinski v. Corizon LLC
as 1:2019cv03202
Defendant:
Corizon LLC
Plaintiff:
Leon S Malachinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv00183
Defendant:
Martin, Ron Neal, Corizon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery P Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis v. Davis et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Corizon, LLC, Ronald Davis, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James D Jarvis and James Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
