Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Brown v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Richard F. Brown
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Centurion Inc., Joule Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Centene Management Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00585
Defendant:
Betty Ullibarri, Michael E. Gottfried, Sydney Goodhand and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Issac v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv00173
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Issac
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Department of Corrections Officials, Corizon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Corizon Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00984
Plaintiff:
Edwin Jones
Defendant:
Corizon Inc., Missouri Department of Corrections, Troy Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lamont Williamson
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Ian Wallace, Mina Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Timothy Perkins
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Corizon, Inc., Jeffery Carson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wysinger v. OSHA, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01668
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Wysinger
Defendant:
OSHA, Inc., St. Louis City, State of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodson v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2016cv01624
Plaintiff:
Cedric Woodson
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, OSHA, Inc., State of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2016cv01621
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jermaine Perkins
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Francis G. Slay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conner v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2016cv01620
Plaintiff:
Ronald Conner
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Frances R. Slay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
