Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Woodyard v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 5:2020cv02021
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services and Dr Gilbardi
Plaintiff:
Draper F Woodyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Michele Copeland, Mary Cooks, Corizon Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Dr. Scott et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant:
Dr. Goltogan, Wexford Medical Services, Corizon Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Kirby Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00529
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miller
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, John Crow, Cynthia Fredricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Defendant:
James Jackson, Thomas Kincey, Traves Yelder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Corizon Medical et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00677
Plaintiff:
Estevernico A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Corizon Medical, Darryl Hamilton, Jackson Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott v. Corizon Medical Services Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00465
Plaintiff:
James Abbott
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc., Dr. Saddiq, Jeff Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Carter et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00415
Plaintiff:
Leon Lamar McGhee
Defendant:
Derrick Carter, Corizon Medical Service , Richard Hallworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Specks et al
as 2:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Carlos Brooks
Defendant:
Cedric Specks, Corizon Medical Services, Officer Hill and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carlos Brooks
Defendant:
Roeisha Butler, Officer Rivers, Sgt. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
