Cases 1 - 10 of 490
Hernandez-De Cornejo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2731
Petitioner:
GLADIS ESPERANZA HERNANDEZ-DE CORNEJO, EMELY PAOLA CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ and LIAN DANIEL CORNEJO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gante Cornejo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2685
Petitioner:
YESENIA GANTE CORNEJO, FIDEL MENDOZA GANTE, RAMON MENDOZA GANTE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Pechenuk v. County of Alameda, et al.
as 24-756
Plaintiff:
MINDY PECHENUK
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, TIM DUPUIS, CYNTHIA CORNEJO and others
Cornejo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mary E Cornejo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Koller, et al. v. Monsanto Company, et al.
as 24-43
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT KOLLER, TIM FERGUSON, RUBY CORNEJO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MONSANTO COMPANY, BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP and THE SCOTTS COMPANY LLC
Defendant:
SEAMLESS CONTROL LLC
(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Carina Cornejo Martinez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Dennys J. Cornejo v. Federal Bureau of Investigations
as 2:2023cv10187
Plaintiff:
Dennys Jose Cornejo
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
