Cases 41 - 50 of 457
CLARENCE SPURLING v. WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv00053
Defendant:
WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE SPURLING ESQ doing business as SPURLING LAW OFFICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. SMALT
as 1:2021cv00041
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
LARRY J SMALT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. WHITING
as 2:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
PAUL L WHITING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
as 2:2020cv00434
Defendant:
HOMESITE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EWALD v. PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL CORPORATE OFFICE HEADQUARTERS et al
as 1:2020cv00432
Defendant:
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL CORPORATE OFFICE HEADQUARTERS, PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and CHARLES F LOWREY
Plaintiff:
BONNIE L EWALD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. GALLAGHER
as 1:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Defendant:
CODY L GALLAGHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. WALKER et al
as 1:2020cv00398
Defendant:
MARK WALKER, HARRIET SCHMIDT and DAVID SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
WESTPORT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON-TOOTHAKER et al v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00371
Plaintiff:
MARCINA JOHNSON-TOOTHAKER and MEGAN GRAY
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
