Cases 31 - 40 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv14772
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DYNAMIC DUO 8, LLC et al v. KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv14099
Plaintiff:
Maureace Snapp, Dynamic Duo 8, LLC d/b/a Anthem Lounge and DYNAMIC DUO 8, LLC
Defendant:
KINSALE INSURANCE COMPANY, JESUS PRADO, TROPICANA ATLANTIC CITY CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
OLIVOS v. DYNAMEX OPERATIONS EAST, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv13312
Plaintiff:
DAVID OLIVOS
Defendant:
XYZ CORPORATION I-V, JOHN DOE I-V, JANE DOE I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv13104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENRIQUEZ v. ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv11536
Defendant:
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. , JANE DOE I-V, JOHN DOE I-V and others
Plaintiff:
MARIA HENRIQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv11446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RONE et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2017cv08069
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION , NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. RONE and LINDA RONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IAPICHINO v. HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2017cv06521
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE IAPICHINO
Defendant:
HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER , HACKENSACK MEDIRIDAN HEALTH, INC. , JANE DOE I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
