Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Morton v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joshua Morton
Defendant:
Lisa, Captain Bodine, Yellowstone County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Billings Clinic et al
as 1:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners and Billings Clinic
Plaintiff:
William Earl Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berg-Hernandez v. Correctional Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00008
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners, Inc., Yellowstone County, Sam Bofto and others
Plaintiff:
Tara Berg-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mink v. Yellowstone County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Lt. Metzger, Correctional Health Partners, Y. Chret and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Aaron Mink
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Yellowstone County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Yellowstone County, Yellowstone County Sheriff's Office, Yellowstone County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lyle Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Correctional Health Partners et al
as 1:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners, Lt. Bodine, John and Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Martinez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tsosie v. City of Billings et al
as 1:2019cv00064
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners, Matthew Frank, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Vernon Charles Tsosie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Correctional Health Partners et al
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners, Lt. Bodine, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
James Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherall v. Corrections Health Partners et al
as 1:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Allen Witherall
Defendant:
Corrections Health Partners, Nurse Chris, Nurse Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
