Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Bowman et al v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 5:2015cv00223
Plaintiff:
Willis Bowman , Danny Childers , Terry A. Fultz and others
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gamble v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 7:2014cv00045
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gamble v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Corrections Corporation of America, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. McClure et al
as 5:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Bernard C. Carter
Defendant:
N. McClure, Tammy Hicks, Donna Stivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. Corrections Corporation of America
as 3:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Johnson , Richie Chesser , Stephen Herman and others
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Griffin v. Doe(s) et al
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Griffin
Defendant:
John Doe(s), Matthew Critton, Mr. Caudell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hammonds v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 7:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
Funda Hammonds
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Dwight Crowell , Jeff Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey et al v. Isaac et al
as 7:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
David W. Bailey
Defendant:
Bobby Isaac, Correctional Corporation of America and Randy Stovall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
